1. General Model Information
Name: Chemicals, Runoff and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems
Acronym: CREAMS
Main medium: terrestrial
Main subject: hydrology, biogeochemistry
Organization level: ecosystem
Type of model: not specified
Main application:
Keywords: soil erosion, runoff, water quality, pollutant transport, field scale, watershed, management, continuous-time, capacity cascade soil water model, Curve-Number-runoff
Contact:
Dr. R. Wayne Skaggs
Professor Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department
Box 7625 Raleigh
North Carolina 27695
phone: +1 919 515-6739
fax: +1 919 515-7760
email: skaggs@eos.ncsu.edu
Author(s):
Foster, G. R., L. J. Lane, J. D. Nowlin, J. M. Laflen and R. A. Young, Smith, S. J., D. E. Kissel and J. R. Williams 1980 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in conjunction with the Science and Education Administration-AgricultureResearch (SEA-AR)
Abstract:
CREAMS is a field scale model for predicting runoff, erosion, and chemical transport from
agricultural management systems. It is applicable to field-sized areas. CREAMS can operate on
individual storms but can also predict long term averages (2-50 years). The objectives of the model were:
- 1)the model must be phyysically based and not require calibration for
each specific application,
- 2)the model must be simple, easily understood with as few parameters
as possible and still represent the physical system relatively
accurately,
- 3)the model must estimate runoff, percolation, erosion, and
dissolved and adsorbed plant nutrients and pesticides and,
- 4)the model must distinguish between management practices.
Based on these objectives, since the management practices were
usually on a field basis, the size of a field to represent the scale
of the model was needed. A field is defined in the context of the
CREAMS model as a management unit having 1) a single land use, 2)
relatively homogeneous soils, 3) spatially uniform rainfall, and
4) single management practices, such as conservation tillage or terraces
Processes and Approach:
The hydrologic component consists of two options. When only
daily rainfall data are available to the user, the SCS curve number
model is used to estimate surface runoff. If hourly or breakpoint
rainfall data are available, an infiltration-based model is used to
simulate runoff. Water movement through the soil profile is modeled using a simple capacity approach, with flow occurring when a layer exceeds field capacity. The erosion component maintains elements of the
USLE, but includes sediment transport capacity for overland flow.
The plant nutrient submodel of CREAMS has a nitrogen component that
considers mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification processes.
Plant uptake is estimated, and nitrate leached by percolation out
of the root zone is calculated. Furthermore, both the nitrogen and
phosphorus parts of the nutrient component use enrichment ratios to
estimate that portion of the two nutrients transported with sediment.
The pesticide component considers foliar interception, degradation,
and washoff, as well as adsorption, desorption, and degradation in
the soil.
Several of the equations developed for the CREAMS model have been used or modified within other models, such as
II. Technical Information
II.1 Executables:
Operating System(s): DOS, UNIX
II.2 Source-code:
Programming Language(s): FORTRAN
II.3 Manuals:
II.4 Data:
III. Mathematical Information
III.1 Mathematics
III.2 Quantities
III.2.1 Input
III.2.2 Output
IV. References
Foster, G. R., L. J. Lane, J. D. Nowlin, J. M. Laflen and R. A. Young. 1980. : A model to estimate sediment yield from field-sized areas: Development of model. In: W. G. Knisel (ed.) CREAMS: A field scale model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems, U. S. Dept. of Agric., Sci. and Educ. Admin., Conser. Rep. No. 26. pp. 36-64.Kinsel, Walter G.(ed.),1980 CREAMS: A Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion From Agricultural ManagementSystems. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Conservation ReportNo. 26, 640 pp.Heatwole, C. D., K. L. Campbell, and A. B. Bottcher. 1987: Modified CREAMS hydrology model for Coastal Plain flatwoods. Trans. ASAE 30:1014-1022.Heatwole, C. D., K. L. Campbell, and A. B. Bottcher. 1988: Modified CREAMS nutrient model for Coastal Plain flatwoods. Trans. ASAE 31:154-160.Parsons, J. E. and R. W. Skaggs. 1988: Water quality modeling with DRAINMOD and CREAMS. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 88-2569. St. Joseph, MI 49085.Parsons, J. E., R. W. Skaggs and J. W. Gilliam. 1989: Pesticide fate with DRAINMOD/CREAMS. Proc. of the CREAMS/GLEAMS Symposium. Sept. 27-29, 1989, Athens, GA.Saleh, A. R. B., R. L. Bengtson, J. L. Fouss and R. W. Skaggs. 1992: Validating the DRAIN-MOD-CREAMS model in a warm, humid climate. In: D. L. Thomas, A. Shirmohammadi and B. A. Engel (ed.) Application and Enhancement of Hydrologic/Water Quality Models. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 372. pp. 59-74. Smith, S. J., D. E. Kissel and J. R. Williams. 1980. Nitrate production, uptake, and leaching. In: W. G. Knisel (ed.), CREAMS: A Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management System. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration, Conservation Report No. 26. pp 65-87.
V. Further information in the World-Wide-Web
- SWRRBWQ
- North Carolina State University:student's review of CREAMS
VI. Additional remarks
Comparison of WEPP and CREAMS:
- B. Major similarities
- 1. Model structure similar but CREAMS more detailed
- 2. Provide similar hydrologic and erosion estimates
- 3. Both operate on individual storms
- 4. WEPP profile and watershed versions and CREAMS model fieldrepresentationsare the same
- C. Major differences
- 1. User environment
- a. CREAMS is not intended for day-to-day field operations
- 2. WEPP does not compute chemical movement
- 3. CREAMS algorithms are more detailed and thus more powerful
- 4. CREAMS uses older technology including SCS curve number runoffprediction method and USLE factors(Note: CREAMS is structured so that components can be and are being changed)
- 5. CREAMS is primarily intended to operate as a continuous simulation model
- 6. CREAMS is limited to a single crop in a "field"
- 7. CREAMS has no comparable "grid" model
Source:http://soils.ecn.purdue.edu/~wepphtml/wepp/wepptut/jhtml/advdisb.html
Last review of this document by: T. Gabele: 24. 6. 1997
Status of the document:
last modified by
Tobias Gabele Wed Aug 21 21:44:41 CEST 2002